If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the Forum Rules
. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to RPGamer's new forums running under Vanilla Forums! If you're run into any odd or strange issues after our software migration please see this thread
Ussually, I've found the the reviews on this site are pretty accurate. Games are analyzed in a very objective, fair manner. I've come to rely on this site's reviews when I think about trying out a new RPG. However, the past two reviews I've seen on this site (FFXI and FFX-2) have some problems. Specifically, with their numerical rating. FFXI recieved a 6 overall, which is exactly what you would get if you average together all the individual scores. FFX-2, however recieved an 8. When you look at how the game scores in its individual catagories, this doesn't quite fit. Simply averaging together the individual scores, the game should be ranked as a 5. I suppose one could argue that a game's overall value is greater than the sum of its parts, but if that is the case, FFXI should still have been scored higher than FFX-2 as it provided much more play time and a higher level of difficulty. I think that it is possible that the reviewer's amoration for FFX, however misplaced, was transfered to FFX-2, despite it being an inferior game.